![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
||
Case StudyClinical Study Program in Oncology...A Global, Peri-Approval, Clinical Study Program in OncologyCase Study OverviewInvestigator initiated trials are used to widen prescriber experience of a drug around the time of launch. New products may elicit numerous and frequent requests to allow the use of the agent in regimens or settings that may or may not be part of the final approved label. Although these requests may be of interest to the sponsor company, they are often considered on an individual basis without reference to development strategy or regard to how this would fit into an overall peri-launch strategy including a publication plan. Consequently, there is a need to capitalize on prescribers’ interest in a new drug and to channel this interest into a programme that will explore, in a controlled way, the utility of the drug in different therapeutic regimes and settings. Structured investigation should lead to a greater proportion of complete studies and successful publication or presentation of results. Using this approach, potential supplementary indications may emerge to be part of the life-cycle management of the drug. This approach will also allow for a prospective planning of publications, avoid duplication and allow a broader spread of study designs. In addition, where endpoints are similar across studies, this approach allows for a consistent way in interpreting results thus allowing cross-study comparability and, in particular, standardization in safety reporting. The Fulcrum EffectThe CaseThe customer is a large, global, pharmaceutical company with an extensive network of affiliate companies. Phase IV studies are undertaken within the global development function, or more often by global marketing and/or affiliates. The customer had not previously attempted a coordinated, investigator-led programme of trials before and the in-house resources were already stretched to the point where a variety of external resources were necessary. Finally, the customer was in the process of gaining global regulatory approval and launching an important new product that it wished to support with a large, driven and structured programme of investigator-led clinical trials.
Together, Fulcrum and the customer defined those factors that would be critical to a successful outcome and against which Fulcrum's performance might be measured:
Fulcrum's Contribution to SuccessTools and processesFulcrum provided central project management, co-ordination and communication, including:
The success of the project has meant that the number of studies has increased from 35 to 80 and now involves sites in 15 countries, including the clearing of a backlog of proposals pre-dating Fulcrum's involvement. Final (approved) protocols and CRFs (as necessary) have been delivered quickly (usually within 8 weeks of receipt of study request) to allow fast study start up and maintain the motivation of investigators. Consistent and high standards of qualityQuality and consistency across studies has been ensured using specific processes such as agreed templates for documents and databases, defined and agreed study end-points and agreed statistical methodology. Fulcrum co-ordinated the management of, and input to, protocol preparation, study reports and draft publications including:
Fulcrum designed and delivered a project infrastructure using a virtual approach, supported by specific processes, tools and technology that could be expanded as necessary to meet demand. The virtual approach adopted by Fulcrum is based on the selection and management of appropriate outsourced resources including:
|
|
||||||